The Personal Website of Mark W. Dawson
Three Scholars Understanding and Defending the Constitution
Having a great interest in Natural and Constitutional Rights, I refer to several different scholars on these topics. The three constitutional historians and scholars that I regularly follow are Robert G. Natelson, Jonathan Turley, and Michael Stokes Paulsen. Below are some of the more interesting articles that they have written on Natural and Constitutional Rights topics.
Robert G. Natelson
Robert G. Natelson has been a law professor for over 25 years, serving at three different universities. Among other subjects, he taught Constitutional Law, Constitutional History, Advanced Constitutional Law, and First Amendment. Professor Natelson is especially known for his studies of the Constitution’s original meaning. His research on that subject has carried him to libraries throughout the United States and in Britain, including four months at Oxford. His books and articles span many different parts of the Constitution, including groundbreaking studies of the Necessary and Proper Clause, federalism, Founding-Era interpretation, regulation of elections, and the amendment process of Article V. His research articles on the Constitution’s meaning have been cited repeatedly by justices and parties in the Supreme Court. Robert G. Natelson is a senior fellow in constitutional jurisprudence at the Independence Institute in Denver, and he authored “The Original Constitution: What It Actually Said and Meant” (3rd ed., 2015), which I believe is one of the finest books on understanding what our Founding Fathers intended in creating the Constitution.. He is a contributor to the Heritage Foundation’s “Heritage Guide to the Constitution”, and he is also the author of many commentary pieces about the Constitution in today’s society, which can be viewed by clicking here .
Several of these commentary articles are a series of essays on Constitutional topics. These essays are:
- The Values in the Declaration of Independence
- The Values in the Constitution
- The Relationship Between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution
- The greatest constitutional document of all
- Yes, the Constitution Does Matter—A Lot
- English Law and the Constitution
- The Poetry in the Constitution’s Preamble
- Constitutional Nuggets: What the Constitution Really Meant About …
- Yes, the Constitution was adopted legally
- Do We Have a ‘Living Constitution’?
- Here’s What a Truly Conservative Supreme Court Would Do
- Originalism: Civics 101: How to Understand the Constitution
- Originalism: Underselling Originalism
- Originalism: Original Intent, Original Understanding, Original Meaning
- Originalism: Original intent? Understanding? Meaning?
- Originalism: A Response to a “Living Constitutionalist”
- Originalism: Constitutional Originalists Love America
- Defending the Constitution: From the ‘Living Constitutionalists’
- Defending the Constitution: Limits on Federal Authority
- Defending the Constitution: Secrets Behind Those ‘Obscure’ Provisions
- Defending the Constitution: The ‘Three-Fifths Compromise’ Was Not Based on Racism
- Defending the Constitution: The 2nd Amendment Is Not Outdated
- Defending the Constitution: The Constitution Never Discriminated Against Women
- Defending the Constitution: The Founders’ Words Were Not ‘Meaningless’ or ‘Vague’
- Defending the Constitution: The Framers Did Not Violate Their Trust
- Defending the Constitution: Why State Equality in the Senate Makes Sense
- Defending the Constitution: Why the Founders Couldn’t Abolish Slavery
- Defending the Constitution: Why the Framers Thought Ratification by Only Nine States Was Sufficient
- Understanding the Constitution: Can the 25th Amendment Be Used to Remove Biden?
- Understanding the Constitution: Constitutional Amendments Work
- Understanding the Constitution: How the Document Was Composed
- Understanding the Constitution: Income taxes, other taxes & the 16th Amendment
- Understanding the Constitution: Originalism Was Not Invented by Partisan Republicans
- Understanding the Constitution: Strict Construction, Textualism, and Originalism
- Understanding the Constitution: The 14th Amendment: Part I
- Understanding the Constitution: The 14th Amendment: Part II
- Understanding the Constitution: The 17th Amendment and Direct Election of Senators
- Understanding the Constitution: The English Foundation
- Understanding the Constitution: The Force of the Preamble
- Understanding the Constitution: The Great Forgetting
- Understanding the Constitution: The Power to Restrict Immigration
- Understanding the Constitution: The Style of the Preamble
- Understanding the Constitution: The Truth about the Much-Abused Commerce Clause
- Understanding the Constitution: Why Biden is wrong to think the 9th Amendment protects abortion
- Understanding the Constitution: Why It Doesn’t Protect the Unborn (please note that I have posted a critique of his arguments here)
- Understanding the Constitution: Why Most Federal Land Holdings Are Unconstitutional and Why You Should Care
- Understanding the Constitution: The Speaker of the House
- Understanding the Constitution: How States May Respond to Illegal Immigration, Part I
- Understanding the Constitution: How States May Respond to Illegal Immigration, Part II
- Understanding the Constitution: How States May Respond to Illegal Immigration, Part III
- Understanding the Constitution: How States May Respond to Illegal Immigration, Part IV
- Understanding the Constitution: How States May Respond to Illegal Immigration, Part V: About Birthright Citizenship
- The Constitution and Elections, Part I: The Founders’ Design
- The Constitution and Elections, Part II: Ideal Voters and Changes by Amendment
- The Constitution and Elections, Part III: 20th
Century Changes
- The Constitution and Elections, Part IV: Adopting an Election-Protection Amendment
- The Rule of Law: Governor DeSantis and the Rule of Law—Part I
- The Rule of Law: Governor DeSantis, the Raid on
Trump, and the Rule of Law—Part II
- How the Supreme Court Rewrote the Constitution: 1937–1944, Part I: A government small and frugal
- How the Supreme Court Rewrote the Constitution: 1937–1944, Part II: The Stage is Set
- How the Supreme Court Rewrote the Constitution, Part III: The Court on the Brink
- How the Supreme Court Rewrote the Constitution Part IV: A packed court—and a federal land grab
- How the Supreme Court Rewrote the Constitution Part V: Killing Economic Freedom
- How the Supreme Court Rewrote the Constitution Part VI: Crushing Civil Liberties
- How the Supreme Court Rewrote the Constitution Part VII: Concentration Camps—and the End
- The Ideas That Formed the Constitution, Part 1: First in a Series
- The Ideas That Formed the Constitution, Part 2: The Founders’ Education
- The ideas That Formed the Constitution, Part 3: The Pioneers: Socrates, Xenophon, Plato
- The Ideas That Formed the Constitution, Part 4: The Pioneers: Socrates, Xenophon, Plato, and the Founders
- The Ideas That Shaped the Constitution: Part 5: Aristotle
- The Ideas That Shaped the Constitution: Part 6: Polybius
- The Ideas That Formed the Constitution: Part 7: Cicero
- The Ideas That Formed the Constitution, Part 8: Cicero (Cont.)
- The Ideas That Formed the Constitution, Part 9: Virgil and Other Poets
- The Ideas That Formed the Constitution, Part 10: Virgil Alone
- The Ideas That Formed the Constitution, Part 11: Livy
- The Ideas That Formed the Constitution, Part 12: Plutarch
- The Ideas That Formed the Constitution, Part 13: Tacitus
- The Ideas That Formed the Constitution, Part 14: Machiavelli
- The Ideas That Formed the Constitution, Part 15: James Harrington, with Comments on Algernon Sidney
- The Ideas That Formed the Constitution, Part 16: John Locke and the Ninth Amendment
- The Ideas That Formed the Constitution, Part 17: Sir Isaac Newton
- The Ideas That Formed the Constitution, Part 18: Montesquieu
- The Ideas That Formed the Constitution, Part 19: Jean-Louis DeLolme
- The Ideas That Formed the Constitution, Part 20: Emer de Vattel and the Law of Nations
- The Ideas That Formed the Constitution, Part 21: Coke, Blackstone, and English Law
- The Ideas That Formed the Constitution, Part 22: Public Education
- The Founders and the Constitution, Part 1: Introduction
- The Founders and the Constitution, Part 2: John Adams
- The Founders and the Constitution, Part 3: James Madison
- The Founders and the Constitution, Part 4: John Dickinson
- The Founders and the Constitution, Part 5: Edmund Randolph
- The Founders and the Constitution, Part 6: James Wilson
- The Founders and the Constitution, Part 7:
John Rutledge
- The Founders and the Constitution, Part 8: Alexander Hamilton
- The Founders and the Constitution, Part 9:
George Washington
- The Founders and the Constitution, Part 10: Gouverneur Morris
- The Founders and the Constitution, Part 11: George Mason
- The Founders and the Constitution, Part 12: Benjamin Franklin
- The Founders and the Constitution, Part 13:
The Connecticut Delegates
As always, with the works of Robert G. Natelson, these articles are well researched and scholarly but are brief and easily understood by the general public.
Jonathan Turley
Jonathan Turley is an American attorney, legal scholar, writer, commentator, and legal analyst in broadcast and print journalism. A professor at George Washington University Law School, he has testified in United States Congressional proceedings about constitutional and statutory issues. Jonathan Turley’s website Res ipsa loquitur – The thing itself speaks is a collection of his articles that are brief and easily understood by the general public, as well as being well reasoned and thoughtful. I am particularly impressed by Professor Turley’s articles on the defense of the Right to Free Speech which can be reviewed here. Some of his more extensive writings on Free Speech and First Amendment rights that are available as pdf downloads are:
- Testimony on the Weaponization of the Federal Government
- Fanning The Flames: Disinformation and Extremism In The Media
- Harm and Hegemony - The Decline of Free Speech in the United States
- The Right of The People Peacefully To Assemble: Protecting Speech By Stopping Anarchist Violence
Michael Stokes Paulsen
Michael Stokes Paulsen is the Distinguished University Chair & Professor of Law at the University of St. Thomas, where he has taught since 2007. Professor Paulsen is a graduate of Northwestern University, Yale Law School, and Yale Divinity School. He has served as a federal prosecutor, as Attorney-Advisor in the Office of Legal Counsel of the U.S. Department of Justice, and as counsel for the Center for Law & Religious Freedom. He is the author of the book (along with his son Luke Paulsen), "The Constitution: An Introduction", which is another fine book to understand the Constitution. Michael Stokes Paulsen's articles here, here, and here are also well researched and scholarly but are brief and easily understood by the general public. Some of his more interesting articles on the Constitution are:
- Everything You Need to Know About Constitutional Law
- Citizens, Unite! Part Two of Your Constitutional Primer
- The Uselessness of Constitutional Law
- The Stakes of Free Exercise
- The Unprecedented, Extraordinary, Anti-democratic, Activist Power of Judicial Review
- Where in the Constitution is “Separation of Church and State”?
- The Constitutional Position and Powers of the Presidency: Executing Laws and Interpreting the Constitution
- The Constitutional Powers of War and Peace
- How to Avoid an Unconstitutional War: A Beginner’s Guide for Presidents and Congresses
- The Constitutional Power of the Electoral College
In addition, Michael Stokes Paulsen is passionately anti-abortion based on his understanding of Natural and Constitutional Rights. His intellectual reasoning for his stance is as follows:
- The Magnificence of Dobbs
- The Unbearable Wrongness of Roe
- The One and Only Pro-Life Argument
- Planned Parenthood v. Casey at Twenty: The Worst Constitutional Decision of All Time
- Casey: Enduring, Entrenched, Intentionally Evil Egregious Error
- The Radical Wrongness of Roe
- Repudiating Roe (Part I): The Most Important Abortion Case in Thirty Years
- Repudiating Roe (Part II): The Pernicious Doctrine of Stare Decisis
- The Right to Life and the Irrelevance of Rape
- Men, Abortion, Sin, and Salvation
- Abortion and the Constitution in Another Forty Years: A Right to Life for 2053
All three of these scholars are ardent in their Understanding and Defense of the Constitution and Natural Rights, and we all should pay heed to their knowledge, intellect, and wisdom on these topics.