The Personal Website of Mark W. Dawson
Containing His Articles, Observations, Thoughts, Meanderings,
and some would say Wisdom (and some would say not).
Science Articles
The following are articles that I have written on scientific
topics, with an emphasis on Atomic Physics, Astronomy, and
Engineering (these being the areas with which I am familiar and
knowledgeable). I would like to note that science and engineering
are often viewed by the general public as cold and dispassionate.
They are not! While the results of science and engineering are
often presented in a cold and dispassionate manner, the process is
anything but. The process of science and engineering is very
human, with its practitioners utilizing the imagination and
creativity of an artist and the resulting foils and conflicts of
any human endeavor. As such, I have tried in these articles to
highlight the human side of science and engineering whenever
possible.
The men and women of science and engineering are as passionate,
and sometimes more passionate, as any other men and women. They
are driven to understand the workings of nature and increase human
knowledge of the universe. I personally believe that if you want
to know what nature is made of, where it came from, how it works,
and how it came to be, then you need to know and understand
science and look to science for the answers to nature. But science
cannot answer all the questions of the universe, as some questions
are outside the scope of science. Questions such as the meaning of
intelligent life and its purposes, its morality and ethics, the
nature of mind versus the brain, and if God exists and, if so, the
nature of God. These questions, and many others, are outside the
scope of science. For these answers, you must look to
philosophers, moralists and ethicists, and theologians. By
combining science with these other arenas, you can hope to achieve
a better understanding of the universe and our place in it. As
such, I am reminded of the words of one of the greatest scientists
in history and one of the greatest science popularizers of the
last half of the 20th century.
"Science is not only compatible
with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality."
- Carl Sagan
"Science without religion is lame,
religion without science is blind."
- Albert Einstein
I should point out that I am NOT a scientist nor Engineer, nor
have I received any education or training in the sciences or
engineering. These articles are the result of my readings on these
subjects in the past decades. Many academics, scientists, and
engineers would critique what I have written here as not accurate
nor through. I freely acknowledge that these critiques are
correct. It was not my intentions to be accurate or through, as I
am not qualified to give an accurate nor through description. My
intention was to be understandable to a layperson so that they can
grasp the concepts. Academics, scientists, and engineers
entire education and training are based on accuracy and
thoroughness, and as such, they strive for this accuracy and
thoroughness. I believe it is essential for all laypersons to
grasp the concepts of science and engineering, so they make more
informed decisions on those areas of human endeavors that deal
with science, engineering, and technology. As such, I did not
strive for accuracy and thoroughness, only understandability.
Table of Contents
- Science Subjects
- On the Nature of Scientific
Inquiry - June 2025 Update
- The Fundamentals of the
Universe - April 2026 Update
- The Four Forces of Nature -
April 2026 Update
- The Strangeness of Atomic
Physics and Quantum Mechanics - April 2026
- Physical Cosmology - June 2025
- What's So Special about
Special Relativity - September 2018
- The Universality of
Gravity - September 2018
- The History of Atomic
Physics - April 2026 Update
- The Arrow of Time
- September 2018
- Chaos, Complexity, Network,
and Dynamic Science - August 2022
- Scientific Issues
- The Big Questions - February
2019
- What is Reality? - September
2019
- Mysteries of the Modern
Universe - March 2025
- The Copenhagen Interpretation
- February 2022
- Strings, Superstrings, and
M-theory Oh My - November 2023
- The Problems with Modern
Science - August 2024 Update
- Scientific Consensus and
Settled Science - August 2020
- Orthodoxy in Science - Jun
2023
- Beware of Computer Modeling and
Statistical Processing - July 2023
- Computer Modeling
- September 2018
- Engineering
Failures - September 2018
- Science Perspectives
- Is Artificial Intelligence
Possible? - November 2019
- Is Interstellar Travel
Possible? - April 2026
- Can We Go to Mars? - April
2026
- Naturalistic/Materialistic or
Intelligent Design Evolution - November 2023
- Scientific Evidence for a
Creator - February 2026
- Simple and Complex Life’s
Creation - January 2026
- UFO's, and
Pseudoscience - October 2019
- Climate Change
- July 2023 Update
- SETI and Vulcan - August 2019
- Science versus
Religion - November 2023 Update
- What Sign are You?
- November 2019
- Intelligent Life in the Universe
- Evolution to Intelligent Life
- October 2025 Update
- Intelligent Life in the
Universe - October 2025 Update
- The Fire of Mankind - December
2019
- Science vs. Science
Fiction - June 2025 Update
- Science Tidbits
- Apocalypse - Or the Ways that
Humanity Will Come to an End -
November 2025 Update
- Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn -
May 2019
- Math (and statistical
mathematics) is More than Numbers - October 2019
- Mathematical Tools of Modern
Science and Engineering - May 2023
- Other Science Articles
- The 18 Biggest Unsolved
Mysteries in Physics - February 2017
- The Real War on Science by
John Tierney - Autumn 2016
- Thoughts of Michael Crichton -
June 2023
- Further Readings
- A Personal Note
- Disclaimer
Science Subjects
This article is an outline of the nature of scientific inquiry.
It does not delve into the details of science and utilizes no
mathematics, but instead presents the basic concepts of scientific
inquiry. This paper was written to provide the general public with
the background of science so that when they encounter scientific
issues, or public policy issues that utilize science, they will
have a basis for interpreting the scientific information.
"I cannot violate the laws of physics" is a famous saying of
Chief Engineer Montgomery Scott in "Star Trek". And so, it is, you
cannot violate the laws of physics, you cannot compensate for the
laws of physics, and you cannot ignore the laws of physics. You
must always cognizant of the Laws of Physics and obey them. And
so, it is with all of The Fundamentals of the Universe. This
article outlines the Fundamentals of the Universe in language that
the layperson can understand.
In my Science Article "The
Fundamental Properties and Constants of the Universe" I
explore the universal fundamentals of science. In this article I
will briefly explore the four forces in the Universe known to
science; Gravity, Electromagnetism, and the Strong and Weak Atomic
forces and their interactions.
Atomic Physics and Quantum Mechanics are cornerstones of our
modern technological world. Atomic Physics is crucial because it
helps us understand the structure and behavior of atoms, which are
the fundamental building blocks of matter. Quantum Mechanics is
the foundation for all electrical and electronic devices used
today. Without Quantum Mechanics, the technology we use could not
function properly. Atomic Physics and Quantum Mechanics involve
some very unintuitive and strange phenomena, which this article
examines.
Physical cosmology is a branch of cosmology concerned with the
study of cosmological models. A cosmological model, or simply
cosmology, provides a description of the largest-scale structures
and dynamics of the universe and allows study of fundamental
questions about its origin, structure, evolution, and ultimate
fate. Cosmological models must account for four Fundamentals of
the Universe for the model to be considered a proper scientific
theory:
Special Relativity has to do with Einstein's question, as a young
man, of what the world would like to look like if you could run
next to a beam of light. A question for which Physics had no
answer. This article is about how Einstein discovered the answer
to this question and the implications of his answer. It is
presented without delving deeply into the science and without
utilizing mathematics.
This paper is an overview of the development of Gravitational
Physics. It is done by focusing on ten scientists who were crucial
in its development. Although thousands of scientists have
contributed to the development of Gravitational Physics the ten
scientists presented here have made such a significant impact as
to change the course of Gravitational Physics. It is, therefore, a
biographical history of Gravitational Physics. The scientific
information is presented in general terms, and there is no
mathematics.
This article is an overview of the development of Atomic Physics.
It is done by focusing on a bakers dozen scientists who were
crucial in its development. Although thousands of scientists have
contributed to the development of Atomic Physics the twelve
scientists presented here have made such a significant impact as
to change the course of Atomic Physics. It is, therefore, a
biographical history of atomic physics. The scientific information
is presented in general terms, and there is no mathematics.
The arrow of time refers to the question of what is the meaning
of time, why and how time flows, and what is the physical nature
of time? In the book "Now: The Physics of Time" by Ricard A.
Muller this eminent physicist addresses these issues. This
observation is based on his book and my own belief in the nature
of time.
This article is an examination of the issues and concerns of
Chaos, Complexity, and Network Science, and their impacts on
Science, Engineering, Computer Models and Societal decision
making. What are Chaos, Complexity, and Network Science, and what
does it have to do with the impacts previously mentioned - Directly
Everything and Indirectly Everything! If you are
going to utilize computer modeling in science and engineering to
determine future possibilities or to decide or formulate a public
policy based on computer modeling then you need to be aware of
chaos, complexity, and network science. I will not delve into
specific details of Chaos, Complexity, and Network Science, nor
will I be utilizing any science or mathematics in discussing these
issues and concerns.
Scientific Issues
In my humble opinion, there are three big questions, that are yet
unanswered, that need to be resolved by physics in the near
future. Without a resolution to these questions physics may be
'stuck' in a conundrum.This article examine these big questions.
It is not in a metaphysical sense that I ask this question, but
in a physical sense of the nature of the Universe. The goal of
physics is to answer the questions of what the reality of the
Universe is. Today, we have three great unknowns about the reality
of the Universe; Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and the reality of
Quantum space. This article examines these issues.
An examination of some of the conundrums of modern physics and
cosmology that need resolution for them to be coherent and
unified. Most of these conundrums are of a small scale, but a few
of these conundrums are large and strike at the heart of physics
and cosmology. The resolution of these large-scale conundrums will
significantly impact modern physics and cosmology and, thus, our
understanding of the workings of the Universe.
This article is an examination of The Copenhagen Interpretation
of Quantum Physics and the issues regarding the current science of
Quantum Theory. The most basic issue is what is the reality
underlying the Quantum world, and how The Copenhagen
Interpretation is ignoring this issue. This is a companion piece
to my 'What is Reality?' article in that explains the importance
of the problems of Quantum Mechanics.
An examination of the issues of the realities of these theories
of Particle Physics, as to date, there has been no scientific
verification or any predictability in these theories.
This article is an Outline on The The Problems with Science in
the latter half of the 20th century and the 21st century. It is
not about the science, but the way modern science is pursued. It
does not delve into the details of science and utilizes no
mathematics, but instead highlights the issues regarding Modern
Science (post World War II) This paper was written to provide the
general public with the background on these problems so that when
they encounter public policy issues that utilize science they will
have a basis for interpreting the scientific information.
The Proverb 'People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw
stones' should always be remembered during any debate or
discussion, especially in Science discussions. And scientific
consensus and settled science can lead you astray, as it has been
wrong in the past and will continue to be wrong as new knowledge
is obtained. This article is a replacement of my original article
"Glass Houses and Consensus in Science" that examines these
issues.
Dissent and Disputation are common in science. When such dissents
and disputations occur, it is acceptable to critique the science,
but it is unacceptable to criticize the scientists. This tolerance
for dissent and disputations, when based upon the scientific
evidence (or that lack thereof), is healthy for the progress of
science and for the betterment of humankind. This article examines
a modern trend of Scientific Orthodoxy to criticize the scientists
rather than critique the science.
An examination of the general problems associated with Computer
Modeling and Statistical Processing and why you need to be careful
when utilizing Computer Models and Statistical Processes when
making decisions.
In this article I examine in more specificity the issues,
concerns, and limitations when utilizing Computer Models in
science and engineering. I do not delve into details of Computer
Modeling, nor do I utilize any sciences or mathematics in
examining the issues, concerns, and limitations of computer
modeling. However, in this article I provide more information on
computer modeling, with many examples and diagrams to assist the
reader to better understand the complexities of Computer Modeling
and Statistical Processing.
In this article, I will discuss failures in engineering. As
engineering failures become apparent and lead to dramatic
consequences to the public, and politicians, often demand answers
as to how they could have happened. As there are many scientific
and technological reason for an engineering failure it can be
difficult to discover and pinpoint the exact cause of the failure.
This paper is not about specific reasons for an engineering
failure. It is, instead, about the types of failures as it relates
to the human endeavor of engineering. These types of failures can
be categorized as resulting from 1) Failure of Knowledge, 2)
Failure of Imagination, or 3) Failure of Management.
Science Perspectives
Artificial Intelligence implies that no human intervention is
required to produce human-like intelligent capabilities from
Artificial Intelligence. It is this broad definition of Artificial
Intelligence that I wish to examine in this article. This short
article attempts to explore the boundaries of Artificial
Intelligence and provide insights into the answers to this
question. This will be done by providing several examples of the
nuisances of the problems that highlight the issues of Artificial
Intelligence.
We often look up at the night sky, convinced that in a universe
this vast, someone must be looking back. We also wonder and hope
that we can visit them or that they have visited us. But what if
the laws of nature themselves prevent contact? From the absolute
limit of the Speed of Light to Time Dilation, interstellar
travel is impossible, which explains why we are truly alone
in the universe and why we have not been visited by alien
civilizations. The Cosmic Haystack Problem also explains why SETI
(Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) has not succeeded in
detecting signals from alien civilizations. From the tyranny of
the Rocket Equation to the Lorentz factor, the impossibility of
interstellar travel isn't about technology; it's about the
fundamental structure of reality. The Fermi Paradox also explains
why UFOs are likely not what you think they are and why the
silence of the universe is actually a beautiful thing. My new
science article, “Is
Interstellar Travel Possible?”, examines the scientific
issues of Interstellar travel.
With the success of the Artemis II mission, which flew around the
moon and returned safely to Earth, hopes for a lunar outpost have
risen. While this is indeed possible (with some scientific
concerns), hopes for a manned Mars mission have also risen.
However, a manned Mars mission is much more difficult, with
several issues that could be stumbling blocks. My new science
article, “Can
We Go to Mars?”, outlines these stumbling blocks and their
impacts on a manned Mars mission.
Does nature as a whole point to a reality beyond itself, or can
nature be better understood as an autonomous, self-existent, and
self-organizing system? Does the worldview of naturalism or
materialism prevail (hereinafter referred to as
Naturalistic/Materialistic evolution), or does something like
theism or deism (hereinafter referred to as Intelligent Design
evolution) better explain key scientific discoveries? For over a
century, Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution has been as
unquestioned as Newton’s theory of gravity had been unquestioned.
But Newton’s theory of gravity was eventually overturned by
Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity. As science never stops
asking questions, or at least it is not supposed to, many
scientists are taking up the challenge of the origins and
evolution of the Universe and Life that Naturalistic/Materialistic
evolution cannot answer. This article is an examination of the
scientific issues in regard to a Naturalistic/Materialistic
evolution or an Intelligent Design evolution in the origin of the
Universe and of Life.
According to Dr. Stephen Meyer, Director of the Discovery
Institute’s Center for Science and Culture, he and many other
evolutionary biologists believe that the modern Neo-Darwinism
theory of evolution falls short on several fronts and fails to
prove the overall theory. This article examines why he and others
dispute Neo-Darwinism, as well as some of the misconceptions about
what Intelligent Design is or isn’t.
A summary of the origins of simple and complex life, focusing on
the scientific theories of Abiogenesis and the Cambrian Explosion,
along with the unresolved fundamental questions related to these
explanations.
This article is about the beliefs that many people have about
scientific curiosities but are not based on actual science. I am a
skeptic on such matters, but I am willing to accept scientific
evidence and change my opinions. However, as the absence of proof
does not constitute proof of absence, and no scientific evidence
constitutes no science. Until there is scientific evidence I will
not believe that anything is scientific. Some of the more obvious
of these claims are presented, and dissected, in this article.
This is only a limited sample as there are so many examples that
you need, and can obtain, many books that debunk these claims. My
only objective with this article is for you to remain skeptical of
these claims until scientific proof is obtained.
I believe in climate change. I believe the climate has changed in
the past, the climate is currently changing, and the climate will
change in the future. This is a meteorological and geological
scientific fact. The question is whether human activity is causing
the current climate change. This may be true, or may not be true,
depending upon your interpretation of scientific facts and
beliefs. If you had read my observation on the "On the Nature of Scientific Inquiry" you
know that I have a scientific orientation to my thinking, and in
this article, I apply that scientific thinking too many of the
issues and concerns of climate change.
Are we alone in the universe? Are there advanced civilizations
that we can detect? How can we better the odds of making contact?
These questions are both fundamental and universal, and examined
in this article.
I am a firm believer that science is the best way of explaining
the physical properties and physical laws of the universe. I also
am a firm believer that God created our universe and established
its physical properties and physical laws And I see no
conflict between the views of Science and Religion. Science
is the explanation of how God created the universe, and God is the
explanation of why we have the physical properties and physical
laws of the universe. Science cannot prove, or disprove, the
existence of God, as God is outside the realm of science. This
article examines the issue of science versus religion based on my
beliefs.
For millennia astrologers have been casting charts to determine
the future of a person or events. This is often done by plotting
the positions of the stars and planets relative to arbitrarily
defined constellations at their birth or at the time of
significant events in their life. It is claimed by astrologers
that there is a force in the universe that acts upon a person and
influences their life based on these positions. However, only "The Fundamental Properties
and Constants of the Universe" are known to science, and
there are only "The Four
Forces of Nature" known to science. The forces in the
Universe known to science are Gravity, Electromagnetism, and the
Strong and Weak Atomic forces. Therefore, these are the only
forces that can affect a person. But do these forces affect a
person in an astrological manner, and if is this true then how can
it work? This issue is examined in my new Science article "What Sign are You?".
Intelligent Life in
the Universe
An overview of the possibilities of The Rise of Intelligent Life,
The Timeline for the evolution of Intelligent Life, and the
possibility of our Communicating or Visiting with Intelligent
Life.
An examination of the possibility and probability of of the
factors for Intelligent Life evolving on other planets. I would
encourage you to read this article as this issue is not as simple
as it appears at first glance.
Fire is an unexpected and uncontrollable primal fear of all
animal species. No species knew when or where a fire would occur,
and when it occurred it was uncontrollable. The be afraid of fire,
and to flee from fire, was necessary for survival. To this day
this is true for all but one species- Hominoidae, and one genus -
homo. This article examines fire in the importance of human
evolution.
I will concede to no one my love of Science Fiction. Since I was
a young boy, I have read and enjoyed Science Fiction stories, as
well as viewed many Science Fiction movies and television shows.
Indeed, much of my love of science has come from my love of
Science Fiction. But science fiction is mostly based on scientific
speculation, and little of it is based on actual science. This
article examines the actual science and scientific speculation in
science fiction by applying my scientific knowledge to science
fiction.
Science Tidbits
First, the bad news. The Earth is coming to an end. But all
things come to an end. Life is born then dies. And the Earth
through solar evolution will come to an end. When the Sun exhausts
its nuclear fuel, it will go nova and burn the Earth to a cinder.
Geological ages come and go, and they change the nature of life on
Earth. This is not the Apocalypse I wish to discuss in
this article. Instead I will be discussing the Apocalypse of human
civilization (hereinafter referred to as Apocalyptic). Some
Apocalyptic events are likely, some are unlikely, and some may
never occur (but still be possible). Some will occur within a near
term time frame (within one hundred years), some will occur in a
long-term time frame (one hundred to one thousand years), some may
occur thousands of years from now, and some may never occur (but
still be possible). How are we to judge the likelihood and time
frames of Apocalyptic events. This article deals with these
issues.
Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn were philosophers of science.
Philosophy of Science is a sub-field of philosophy concerned with
the foundations, methods, and implications of science. The central
questions of this study concern what qualifies as science, the
reliability of scientific theories, and the ultimate purpose of
science. This discipline overlaps with metaphysics, ontology, and
epistemology, for example, when it explores the relationship
between science and truth. Popper and Kuhn were two 20th century
Philosophers of Science who's ideas have generated much
controversy and debate within the scientific community. This short
article examines this subject.
On the surface, math may seem like it's all about numbers and
formulas. However, this versatile subject is about much more than
just counting, adding, and subtracting. Discover why math is more
than numbers and find out how it contributes to the development of
valuable skills in problem solving, critical thinking, language,
and more.
Galileo was the first scientist of the modern scientific world,
in that he applied Observation and Experimentation, along with
Mathematical Equations, to describe his scientific hypothesis.
Since then math has been integral to science, and Mathematical
computations have become more complex and difficult to compute,
and often fraught with error. In their attempts to perform these
Mathematical computations scientists and engineers have invented
tools to assist them in these Mathematical computations. The most
significant of these Mathematical computational tools are Slide
Rulers, Calculators, and Computers, which this article examines.
Other
Science Articles
In 1900, the British physicist Lord Kelvin is said to have
pronounced: "There is nothing new to be discovered in physics now.
All that remains is more and more precise measurement." Within
three decades, quantum mechanics and Einstein's theory of
relativity had revolutionized the field. Today, no physicist would
dare assert that our physical knowledge of the universe is near
completion. To the contrary, each new discovery seems to unlock a
Pandora's box of even bigger, even deeper physics questions. These
are the website Livescience picks for the most profound open
questions of all.
According to Mr. Tierney The Left has done far more than the
Right to set back progress. All who are interested in the
integrity of Science should read and ponder this article.
Michael
Crichton was an American author and filmmaker with extensive
scientific education and background who, before he died in 2008,
gave some speeches which examined Consensus Science,
Environmentalism, and Global Warming (before it became Climate
Change). This webpage contains these speeches.
Further Readings
Below are the books I would recommend that you read for more
background information on these subjects. They were chosen as they
are a fairly easy read for the general public and have a minimum
of mathematics.
For a brief introduction on these topics I would recommend the
Oxford University Press series "A
Very Short Introduction" on these subjects. In particular I
would recommend the following books as a starting point for your
discovery of science.:
Some interesting websites with general scientific topics
are:
Some Science Videos on the above topics.
Dr. Don Lincoln (born 1964) is an American physicist, author,
host of the YouTube channel Fermilab, and science communicator. He
conducts research in particle physics at Fermi National
Accelerator Laboratory and is an adjunct professor of physics at
the University of Notre Dame. He received a Ph.D. in experimental
particle physics from Rice University in 1994. In 1995, he was a
co-discoverer of the top quark. He has coauthored hundreds of
research papers and, more recently, was a member of the team that
discovered the Higgs boson in 2012.
Dr. Lincoln, in association with Fermilab, has created a series
of short YouTube
videos that delve into the subjects of Particle Physics,
Relativity, and other topics in regards to modern physics. These
videos are very informative and scientifically accurate and
provide a better understanding of the topics covered in this
article. While he does utilize some math in the videos the math
utilized is very simple and not off-putting. If you are interested
in these scientific topics and desire a better understanding of
them, I would suggest that you take a look at these videos.
Some oldies buy goodies DVD's that examine Science and Society:
On Relativity:
On Cosmology:
On Atomic Physics:
For those of you who are interested in Numbers - Not Mathematics,
there is a highly informative YouTube channel "Numberphile".
In a series of short videos, they present many interesting facts
on numbers in an entertaining manner. I would suggest that you
view some of these videos.
A Personal
Note
The incandescent light bulb has often been described as a heat
source that provides some light, given that a light bulb generates
more heat than it does light. In today's public debates we often
find the proponents of an issue providing a lot of heat and only a
little light. These observations are meant to provide illumination
(light) and not argumentation (heat). Opponents in today's society
often utilize the dialog and debate methodology of Demonize,
Denigrate, and Disparage their opponent when discussing issues,
policies, and personages. To demonize, denigrate, or disparage the
messenger to avoid consideration of the message is not acceptable
if the message has supporting evidence. The only acceptable method
of public discourse is disagreement - to be of different opinions.
If you are in disagreement with someone you should be cognizant
that people of good character can and often disagree with each
other. The method of their disagreement is very important to
achieve civil discourse. There are two ways you can disagree with
someone; by criticizing their opinions or beliefs or critiquing
their opinions or beliefs.
- Criticism - Disapproval expressed by pointing
out faults or shortcomings.
- Critique - A serious examination and judgment
of something.
Most people, and most commentators have forgotten the difference
between Criticism and Critique. This has led to the
hyper-partisanship in today's society. In a civil society
critiquing a viewpoint or policy position should be encouraged.
This will often allow for a fuller consideration of the issues,
and perhaps a better viewpoint or policy position without invoking
hyper-partisanship. We can expect that partisanship will often
occur, as people of good character can and often disagree with
each other. Criticizing a viewpoint or policy position will often
lead to hostility, rancor, and enmity, which results in the
breakdown of civil discourse and hyper-partisanship. It is fine to
criticize someone for their bad or destructive behavior, but it is
best to critique them for their opinions or words. We would all do
better if we remember to critique someone, rather than criticize
someone. I would ask anyone who disagrees with what I have written
here to please keep this disagreement civil. I am open to critique
and will sometimes take criticism. I will always ignore
demonization, denigration, and disparagement, or point out the
vacuous nature or the character flaws of those that wish to
silence the messenger rather than deal with the message. Please
remember that if you disagree with the messenger it is not
acceptable to kill the messenger. You may kill the messenger, but
the message will remain. If you have any comments, concerns,
critiques, or suggestions I can be reached at mwd@profitpages.com. I
will review reasoned and intellectual correspondence, and it is
possible that I can change my mind, or at least update the
contents of these articles. This is why these articles are dated.
Whenever I make a change to these articles they will be re-dated.
So check back and see if any articles have been updated (or
perhaps I shall add articles).
Disclaimer
Please note - many academics, scientists, and
engineers would critique what I have written here as neither
accurate nor thorough. I freely acknowledge that these critiques
are correct. It was not my intention to be accurate or thorough,
as I am not qualified to give an accurate or thorough description.
My intention was to be understandable to a layperson so that they
can grasp the concepts. Academics, scientists, and engineers?
entire education and training is based on accuracy and
thoroughness, and as such, they strive for this accuracy and
thoroughness. I believe it is essential for all laypersons to
grasp the concepts of this paper, so they can make more informed
decisions on those areas of human endeavors that deal with this
subject. As such, I did not strive for accuracy and thoroughness,
only understandability.
Most academics, scientists, and engineers, when speaking or
writing for the general public (and many science writers as well),
strive to be understandable to the general public. However, they
often fall short on understandability because of their commitment
to accuracy and thoroughness, as well as some audience awareness
factors. Their two biggest problems are accuracy and the
audience's knowledge of the topic.
Accuracy is a problem because academics, scientists, engineers,
and science writers are loath to be inaccurate. This is because
they want the audience to obtain the correct information, and the
possible negative repercussions amongst their colleagues and the
scientific community at large if they are inaccurate. However,
because modern science is complex, this accuracy can, and often,
lead to confusion amongst the audience.
The audience?s knowledge of the topic is important as most modern
science is complex, with its own words, terminology, and basic
concepts the audience is unfamiliar with, or they misinterpret.
The audience becomes confused (even while smiling and lauding the
academics, scientists, engineers, or science writers), and the
audience does not achieve understanding. Many times, academics,
scientists, engineers, or science writers utilize the scientific
disciplines' own words, terminology, and basic concepts without
realizing that the audience may misinterpret or have no
comprehension of these items.
It is for this reason that I place understandability as the
highest priority in my writing, and I am willing to sacrifice
accuracy and thoroughness to achieve understandability. There are
many books, websites, and videos available that are more accurate
and thorough. The subchapter on ?Further Readings? also contains
books on various subjects that can provide more accurate and
thorough information. I leave it to the reader to decide if they
want more accurate or thorough information and to seek out these
books, websites, and videos for this information.
© 2026 All rights reserved.
If you have any comments, concerns, critiques, or suggestions I
can be reached at mwd@profitpages.com.
I will review reasoned and intellectual correspondence, and it is
possible that I can change my mind,
or at least update the content of this article.
|